The Raila-Ruto Power Deal: Raila’s Big Win or Kenya’s Biggest Betrayal?
Concerns continue to mount over Raila Odinga’s potential deal with President William Ruto. Many question the implications for Kenyans, while others argue the arrangement is a personal gain for Odinga and his close allies. Political analysts suggest that should Odinga join forces with Ruto, it would not be a decision made for the public’s benefit but rather for his personal and political advantage.
Legal experts and political strategists have reportedly been evaluating the framework for a power-sharing arrangement. The talks have raised critical questions on whether Odinga’s inclusion in government would make sense for the country or merely serve his interests. This has left many Kenyans outraged, with some expressing their frustration on social media, feeling betrayed by a leader they have supported for years.
For over two decades, the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) has symbolized hope and resistance, advocating for the rights of Kenyans. However, if ODM aligns with the current administration, many fear it could signify the collapse of opposition politics. Analysts argue that ODM’s strength has always stemmed from its role as a defender of the people, and any perceived alignment with Ruto could damage its credibility irreparably.
Several ODM members, including the party’s Secretary-General, have made statements suggesting that political survival is the priority. While some see this as a pragmatic approach, others worry that it signals a shift from the party’s founding principles. The fate of key figures within ODM remains uncertain, with some leaders potentially facing sidelining if they oppose the new direction.
Sources indicate that should Odinga move closer to Ruto, the possibility of a complete political realignment remains high. Some allies, such as Kalonzo Musyoka, may find themselves caught in the crossfire, while others could be absorbed into the new coalition. The potential for mass defections is real, with politicians weighing their chances in the evolving landscape.
Experts note that Ruto’s main objective in securing an alliance with Odinga is not necessarily to gain votes but rather to neutralize opposition protests and maintain stability. Historically, Odinga has been the only leader capable of mobilizing large-scale demonstrations. If he is co-opted into the government, analysts argue that no other figure could generate the same level of unrest should issues arise in the electoral process.
The Referendum Debate and Power Structure Concerns
A major component of the speculated deal is the introduction of a prime minister’s position, which would require a constitutional amendment through a referendum. Observers believe this is a critical point, as the likelihood of Kenyans approving such a move remains minimal. Past referenda, such as the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), faced significant resistance, and analysts predict a similar fate for any proposed constitutional changes that would empower Odinga within Ruto’s government.
Should a referendum be held, voter turnout is expected to heavily favor those opposing the changes. Even within government circles, there is skepticism about the feasibility of the proposal. Experts predict that the enthusiasm for blocking the referendum will outweigh support for it, ensuring its failure. The administration may, therefore, resort to alternative legal strategies to achieve its objectives.
Political insiders suggest that instead of a referendum, Ruto and Odinga could pursue the National Accord route. This approach, previously used in 2008, allowed for the creation of a prime minister’s position without public approval through a constitutional amendment via Parliament. Should this strategy be employed, Odinga could assume a leadership role without the need for a nationwide vote, effectively bypassing public resistance.
Legal experts argue that this could spark significant debate but ultimately remain legally viable. If challenged in court, the matter could take years to resolve, allowing Odinga to assume the role of prime minister in the meantime. Analysts point out that such maneuvers have been used before in Kenyan politics and could be justified under the premise of national unity and stability.
The potential Raila-Ruto deal is expected to reshape the political landscape heading into the 2027 elections. A coalition between the two could consolidate power and potentially absorb other political heavyweights. However, this scenario could also alienate a segment of the electorate, leading to unpredictable outcomes.
Despite the outcry from citizens, political strategists argue that Kenyan politics is driven by shifting alliances rather than ideological consistency. The memory of past political betrayals tends to fade quickly among voters, allowing leaders to reinvent themselves as circumstances demand. If Odinga secures a role in government, his ability to regain public trust for future elections will largely depend on how he frames his decision.
Visible Power and Political Influence
As political maneuvering unfolds, Raila Odinga is expected to secure significant visible power. His influence will extend beyond symbolic gestures, with expectations of key government changes. The power dynamic is shifting, allowing Raila’s involvement in major governmental decisions, including appointments and governance structuring. This newfound authority will ensure his stronghold over his political base, particularly in Nyanza, Western, and the Coast regions.
The ability to host delegations at home or within government establishments, such as State House, will bolster Raila’s prominence. The capacity to effect immediate changes and offer positions reinforces his role as a central figure in the administration. However, questions arise over who stands to lose in this power equation.
With the upcoming elections, financial resources will play a decisive role. Given William Ruto’s current political standing, the use of money is expected to reach unprecedented levels. Silencing critics and influencing key political figures will be part of the strategy, as money has historically dictated political outcomes. Every political figure has a price, and resources will be strategically deployed to consolidate power. The objective is to ensure Raila’s visible influence in the government, shaping decisions and determining political alignments.
In the event of a power-sharing deal, Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi is anticipated to be among the casualties. If Raila joins the government, Mudavadi may have to relinquish his current role and settle for a ministerial position, potentially in Interior or Finance. Meanwhile, the position of Treasury Cabinet Secretary may be handed to another key Raila ally, further cementing his influence in government operations.
Additionally, structural changes may see Raila leading subcommittees within the Cabinet, reducing the frequency of full Cabinet meetings chaired by the President. Under this arrangement, Raila would oversee regular committee meetings, while Ruto would only preside over occasional grand Cabinet sessions, possibly on a monthly or quarterly basis.
The 2027 Election Strategy
As political analysts evaluate the implications of this deal, the crucial question remains: can this coalition withstand the 2027 elections? If Raila ultimately supports Ruto, how will the electorate perceive this alliance? Will new figures emerge to challenge the status quo, or will established leaders, such as Gladys Wanga, play strategic roles in the political game?
For opposition figures like Kalonzo Musyoka, challenging Ruto in a standard election would be an uphill battle. To counter Ruto’s strategic moves, opposition forces must recreate the political momentum witnessed in the 2002 election. This requires crafting powerful narratives that position Ruto and Raila as political adversaries of the people.
The upcoming election will be determined by the strength of narratives. Winning will not be about mere rhetoric; it will hinge on the ability to craft compelling stories that resonate with the electorate. To successfully challenge the Ruto-Raila alliance, a strong narrative must be built to frame them as a threat to the nation’s democratic future. This requires skilled storytellers capable of driving a movement akin to the historic 2002 Rainbow Coalition.
Read Also: Rigathi and Kalonzo’s Strategy to Defeat Ruto in 2027 Without Raila
Younger voters, particularly Gen Z, must be engaged in this narrative. Their involvement will be critical in mobilizing a powerful movement against the existing political structure. Without their participation, the opposition risks losing momentum and allowing Ruto to secure another term.
If the opposition successfully builds a compelling movement, it could isolate Ruto and Raila, forcing key political allies to abandon them. Kenyan politicians have historically shifted allegiances based on emerging political tides. If an anti-Ruto-Raila movement gains traction, defectors from within their ranks could weaken their grip on power. This scenario mirrors past instances where once-powerful leaders found themselves politically deserted.
Ultimately, the Raila-Ruto deal signifies a major shift in Kenya’s political landscape. Whether this alliance solidifies or collapses under pressure remains to be seen. As the country approaches another election cycle, the ability to control narratives and mobilize the electorate will determine the future of Kenya’s leadership.
The Raila-Ruto Power Deal: Raila’s Big Win or Kenya’s Biggest Betrayal?
